Done properly the MSC remains off-balance sheet. There are exceptions (see below) but, for the most part, we would expect the assets associated with a MSC to be off-balance sheet.
MSC’s can be confused and conflated with a Managed Equipment Service (MES). The two are very different contract types and seek to achieve different things for customers. A description of the differences can be found here. In simple terms, an MES provides an asset(s) and the service related directly to it e.g. maintenance. A MSC, on the other hand, is specifically about service, not equipment, so has a broader (than equipment maintenance) service component attached e.g. purchase to pay, stock management, sub-contractor management of all consumables and services that support the clinical service in which asset(s) are also a part. To illustrate, the value of equipment used in a MSC will be a smaller proportion of the whole contract value. It’s important to focus on the “S” (for Service) in an MSC, rather than the “E” (for Equipment) for an MES. Importantly, it is not about comparing a MES with a MSC – they are different. Whether one is better than the other depends on the value and the benefits the customer is looking for.
So… What keeps a MSC off-balance sheet?
Under IFRS 16, the recipient of the contract must first assess whether a contract is, or contains, a “lease”. The standard sets out a specific set of tests to make the lease determination; importantly, for a contract to contain a lease it must meet all of the tests/requirements; namely:
In other words, agreements within scope are contracts, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an identified asset for a significant period of time in exchange for consideration. In the case of an appropriately structured MSC a customer does not have the rights to:
If the response to both of these is “Yes”, the contract contains a lease and the accounting requirements under IFRS 16 come into force. In other words, the underlying assets goes ‘on balance sheet’.
The key characteristic of a MSC does not link to specific equipment/assets because there is practical application of a ‘service’, rather than the supply of an ’identifiable asset’. A contract for service means:
There are a few exceptions. The right of substitution is only considered substantive, even with a MSC, if the supplier has both the practical ability to substitute alternative assets throughout the period of use and would economically benefit from the substitution. A building or MRI scanner, for example, is unlikely to be subject to easy substitution.
For the most part, as a contract for the supply of service, a service not linked to the supply of an [identifiable] asset, an MSC is distinguishable from a ‘lease’ and, done properly, remains off-balance sheet.
Genmed Group Limited provides vendor-agnostic managed service contracts, managed equipment services and equipment leasing. If you wish to learn more about how your organisation could benefit from managed services, we would be delighted to be contacted through info@genmed.eu
This article is for general information only, it does not constitute the giving of professional advice, and no advisory relationship is formed. The use of information contained in this article or linked materials is at the user’s own risk. Users should not disregard, or delay in obtaining, appropriate professional advice for their specific circumstances and/or case.